3/12/2006

The good is oft interred with their bones

At last, after two years of family outrage (and public ignorance), there will be a new criminal inquiry into the death of Pat Tillman. Nobody disputes now that his body was riddled with friendly (American) bullets when he expired, and I still await a detailed synopsis of the hamfisted military strategy that led to his unit getting surprised and fired upon by comrades, for no apparent reason. But what surprises me -- a secret whispered rarely if ever during the news reports and investigation -- is this:

Interviews also show a side of Pat Tillman not widely known — a fiercely independent thinker who enlisted, fought and died in service to his country yet was critical of President Bush and opposed the war in Iraq, where he served a tour of duty. He was an avid reader whose interests ranged from history books on World War II and Winston Churchill to works of leftist Noam Chomsky, a favorite author.



Now, even I don't consider Noam Chomsky a favorite author, since his prose is invariably dead on its feet. How could an Arizona Cardinals safety dig the works of a celebrity lingusitics professor who is amputating the genitals of his own language? Tillman is probably the only Chomsky fan ever to sweat bullets in the crags of Khost. Sure, once you penetrate his wooden style, Chomsky does reflect a reality that the military propaganda machine avoids at all costs. Does the American military prohibit his works? Let's hope not, though my guess is the appearance of a Chomsky book in a combat situation may constitute grounds for treason.

Justice should be served not only for the manner of Tillman's death, but for the life of his mind, which was obviously more complex than anyone cared to think.

6 Comments:

At 9:06 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm not sure what your point is here Mark. I don't think you'd suggest that Tillman's death would be unimportant except for the fact he read Noam.

Are there inconsistancies in the stories of what happened? Yes. But read any after action reports and you find these. Hence the term, Fog of War.

Worse is folks with no experience trying to dissect what happened. "Hamfisted Military Strategy" says more than you'd think. Armies and Divisions follow Strategies. Platoons and Fireteams follow Tactics. Without even that fundemental understanding of action, and given the inherent fog of war, how successful can you be Mark?

Most soldiers I know identify two major mistakes in what happened. First, the company commander ordered the platoon split when the HMMWV was disabled. It should have been towed to the ORP if the mission was continued. There was simply no reason to recover it immediately.

The second was that the platoon leader (who correctly didn't want to divide the unit) choose to stay with the part of the unit guarding the vehicle. Even if it was "indian country" and he felt an attack on the disabled vehichle was imminent, his obligation is to the mission. And the mission was the raid, that was his place.

This breakdown in command and control is responsible for what happened. Along with about a billion other little factors, none of which could have been controlled.

So what are you hoping to find?

-Censored

 
At 10:32 AM, Blogger Mark D. said...

Thanks for the clarifications, censored, though I don't think hairsplitting over military jargon does *that* much to lift the "fog of war", not in this case. And I also believe the "fog of war" should not be used as a scapegoat for incompetence and misconduct within the U.S. military. The fact is, the U.S. Army lied (and apparently continues to lie) about the circumstances of Tillman's death and the subsequent cover-up. I'm happy that they're finally opening a criminal investigation, as it will hopefully give some peace to his friends and family.

 
At 12:17 PM, Blogger Chris Dykstra said...

Regardless of the causes of his death, there is a conflict between the FOX News Tillman that is the cause celebre of bush's bastard war, and the real Tillman whose inner tuning fork chimed to the call of duty and honor, regardless of who is giving the order.

 
At 4:02 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You know Chris, its sounds alot like you're trying to claim Tillman in the same sentence you condemn others for doing it.

That's hypocritical isn't it?

Mark,

Confusion != Coverup. I'll be surprised if anything comes of a criminal investigation.

-Censored

 
At 1:48 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You will also find a surprisingly number of military folks even those in the lower enlisted ranks who are broadly read.

As for Tillmans tragic death at this point poor leadership within his unit seems to be the biggest cause but also other factors are sure to come to light in this third investigation. Beyond the original shooter and some from the leadership perhaps a small few will be reprimanded for thier actions that fateful day.

Dave

 
At 6:48 PM, Blogger Mark D. said...

Dave,

Even though the military now seems mostly to target working class if not poverty stricken folks for recruiting, I generally assume that most people are well-read, including (especially) soldiers. It's not an entirely valid or true assumption (cf. our President) but I still have faith in our public education system.

I was mostly surprised that Tillman read Chomsky. Even I don't read Chomsky, because he's unreadable. He's like castor oil for lefties.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home