3/04/2005

The virtue of selfishness

The poisonous wheezes of Ayn Rand's most powerful disciple are gathering into clouds: Alan Greenspan supports a fundamental shift to a consumption tax. Why is it that whenever someone posits that a tax policy supports "growth", I'm thinking that poor people are gonna get screwed?

This news comes at the same time that Krugman tears down Greenspan's credentials as a "non-partisan font of wisdom":

When Mr. Greenspan made his contorted argument for tax cuts back in 2001, his reputation made it hard for many observers to admit the obvious: he was mainly looking for some way to do the Bush administration a political favor. But there's no reason to be taken in by his equally weak, contorted argument against reversing those cuts today.

To put Mr. Greenspan's game of fiscal three-card monte in perspective, remember that the push for Social Security privatization is only part of the right's strategy for dismantling the New Deal and the Great Society. The other big piece of that strategy is the use of tax cuts to "starve the beast."

3 Comments:

At 10:54 AM, Blogger Luke Francl said...

Not good: "And the consequence of the failure of the starve-the-beast theory is a looming fiscal crisis - Mr. Greenspan isn't wrong about that. The middle class won't give up programs that are essential to its financial security; the right won't give up tax cuts that it sold on false pretenses. The only question now is when foreign investors, who have financed our deficits so far, will decide to pull the plug."

 
At 11:48 AM, Blogger Sarah D. said...

Greenspan's a hot topic. From a Washington Post Article: "Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan generally gets accolades for his public pronouncements. Yesterday he got a brickbat from Senate Minority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.), who blasted Greenspan as 'one of the biggest political hacks we have here in Washington.'"

 
At 1:50 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Really?

I'm surprised. I had always thought that Greenspan was very middle of the road.

His bio looks like it, http://www.federalreserve.gov/bios/greenspan.htm

Besides, while Krugman is occasionaly clever in a vitrolic way, he's also been know to be completely full of it on occasion as well.

But why is Reid getting into this? What good can come of that?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home