9/14/2004

Iraq news not forged

While the media masturbates over Bush's service records the situation in Iraq continues to, shall we say, decline.

Over the weekend something like 110 people died and 200 were wounded in Baghdad.

While Iraqis try to kill a few Americans and Americans kill lots of Iraqis outside the Green Zone. Life inside the Green Zone paints a picture of an occupation supremely disconnected from the nation we seek to build.

To some, the Green Zone feels like a vast isolation chamber. One recent night at a saloon called The Bunker, a resident contractor asked, "So, what's going on out there in Iraq anyway?" He hadn't left the Green Zone in six months. "It's like Plato's republic in here, all of these well-meaning, smart people who want to do the right thing," says one security contractor and Green Zone regular. "But they never leave here and they have no idea what's happening in the country they're supposed to be building. It's totally absurd."

In another story, Marine Lt. Gen. James T. Conway who was in charge of US forces during the siege of Falluja has criticized the method and timing of US strategy saying,

"When you order elements of a Marine division to attack a city, you really need to understand what the consequences of that will be and not vacillate in the middle of something like that," he said. "Once you commit, you have to stay committed."

When the generals start complaining of civilian interference on the battlefield, it is time to start questioning the battle itself. But more to the point, Dear Leader didn't know what to do.

Have you noticed a sudden derth of editorials attempting to perfume the stink of the Iraq pig with claims that the media is just not showing all the good things that are happening there? I have. That's because the situation in Iraq is worse than you think.

Now, some pundits have put forward the proposition that Kerry and Bush have the same position on Iraq. Fundamentally, I guess that's true: Bush says stay the course; Kerry says stay the course. I don't think anybody knows what will happen after the election. But the very examination of the issue misses the point right now.

The Iraq war is a flaming bag of dog shit on the doorstep of America. The adolescents who filled and lit the bag ran giggling directly to the podium at the GOP National Convention to accept their party's nomination for a second term as President and Vice President of the United States. It is a flabbergasting masterpiece of branding that the President emerged from that convention more trusted by the American people than Kerry to manage the war. I give Rove credit where credit is due for the quality of his spin. But spin won't make Iraq free. Spin won't make us safer. Spin won't stop our porch from catching fire.

It will take strong, creative leadership to solve Iraq. Kerry isn't the one who lit the bag. Kerry is the one who has opened the door to find it flaming at his feet. It is to his credit, and all of our benefit, that he is the kind of person who will consider his options well before he stomps blindly down on the fire.

8 Comments:

At 10:09 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well ya got a point there alrighty.

No one doubts that Kerry would examine all options before making a decision..and again after changing his direction.

He'd likely take all viewpoints into consideration as well. After all what Germany wants and France wants and the Sudan wants and what North Korea and China don't want absolutely needs to be factored into our national defense strategy right?

 
At 12:09 PM, Blogger Chris Dykstra said...

Well of course, Kerry will consider how France and Germany can help. I think that's called negotiation, something Bush has lost the ability to do on behalf of the American people.

 
At 1:30 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The Iraq war is a flaming bag of dog shit on the doorstep of America."

Now that's good writing.

-praktike, via needlenose

 
At 10:02 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Excellent essay. Please post this one as a diary at dailyKos.com, too.

 
At 10:14 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 11:46 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here's some constructive criticism:
1. "something like (some #)", have a little backbone remove the "something like" doubt here, if the # is a little off no one cares.
2. The blogger account required for posting named comments: extremely lame.

 
At 10:58 PM, Blogger Jim said...

Why on earth should Bush give a rats @#$ what France and Germany want to do with our national security. After all, no one has as big an interest in keeping this country safe as we (Americans) do, not even (especially) the all important international community. This is one thing I just cannot understand about the liberal attitude towards national security, you guys just don't seem to get it, France, Germany, Russia, and the rest do not have our best interests in mind. The oil for food scandal should prove that if anything, the only ones they are thinking about are themselves.

 
At 2:08 AM, Blogger Chris Dykstra said...

I give way more than a rat's ass what France and Germany think. I give my ass what they think. I want their unqualified help to make the world a safer place for me and my family. Repeat after me: we want more friends and less enemies. That's the name of the game. Terrorists travel through and get money and support from other countries. In fact, except for our home grown terroristas, they live in other countries. Wouldn't it be nice if they were apprehended in other countries before they got here? In the first Gulf War, the US paid for %5 of the total cost. This time we are paying nearly all of it. Do you think that if we negotiated more effectively we could save, oh, I don't know, enough to effectively secure our ports and borders?

You are right that other countries don't have our national security in the front of their minds. We have our own national security in the front of our minds. That's why we have to represent our national interest effectively to the world. We are the only ones that can do it. We have to sell it in order for our wealthy allies to work for us - do you see?

If you want your neighbor's help in moving a couch down a flight of stairs, do you start the process by punching him in the nose? Do you recruit your neighbors to a community crime watch or a DARE program by telling them you are "with us or you are against us?"

My guess is, since I know your momma raised you right, you know how to ask for help. This administration doesn't know how. It doesn't have a thing to do with the oil for food scandal, just like it doesn't have anything to do with the billion dollars Enron cost foreign investors.

The thing I don't understand is why Republicans seem to be willing to bankrupt the country, spend the lives of our young people and insult our friends in an effort that is not making the country safer? Can you explain that for me?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home