8/17/2006

Judge to Bush: No kings in America

U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor called a halt to the NSA's domestic spying program today. The decision is here.

It will be interesting to watch how steadfastly the President and Gonzalez and the various minions of authority completely ignore the constitution in their response to this. I expect a carefully orchestrated concert of euphimisms on the Sunday talkies. I expect that the concepts of "Doing what it takes to keep you safe," and "Terrorist Surveillance" will play heavily. I expect that some on the right will continue to call for the death of "liberals" with loose lips and have "fun" with the reporters that broke the story by calling them murderers. So let me get this straight, you guys want to keep me safe and kill me?

Don't think for a minute that this is about security. It isn't. It's about power. The administration could keep us just as safe by agressively working through FISA, or working to change the law to adapt to current events. But the authoritarian mindset resists transparency . Thankfully, as the good judge points out:

We must first note that the Office of the Chief Executive has itself been created, with its powers, by the Constitution. There are no hereditary Kings in America and no power not created by the Constitution. So all "inherent power" must derive from that Constitution."

Our security depends most heavily on our understanding of the civil liberties granted us in our constitution. King George cannot keep us safe. President Bush might be able to.

5 Comments:

At 5:57 AM, Blogger Chuck Olsen said...

Can I get an AMEN?!!!

 
At 1:28 PM, Blogger josef said...

John Aravosis has a pretty good reaction to the president's response.

Bush said "I would say that those who, um, um, herald this decision simply do not understand the nature of the world in which we live."

Off the cuff, sure, but he's done worse.

 
At 2:05 PM, Blogger josef said...

John Aravosis has a pretty good reaction to the president's response.

Bush said "I would say that those who, um, um, herald this decision simply do not understand the nature of the world in which we live."

Off the cuff, sure, but he's done worse.

 
At 9:14 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nice snappy quote from the judge but it does not appear that her ruling was very sound and will most likely not withstand further scrutiny by a higher court.

Like polls vs. elections, legal questions like this are meaningless until the final tally is done, we will have to wait until the appelate courts get done with this sometime next year in the meantime the survailance of criminal terrorist rolls on.

Dave

 
At 1:03 AM, Blogger Chris Dykstra said...

You are a criminal terrorist? ..

 

Post a Comment

<< Home