8/23/2005

A funeral march

Nick Coleman's Sunday column about the mood of the striking mechanics captured my feelings well.

This isn't a labor strike. Labor strikes have winners and losers. This is a funeral march. At the end of a funeral march, there are no winners or losers.

There is just sadness.

Maybe that's why the striking Northwest Airlines mechanics look more grief-stricken than angry: They walked away from jobs they were losing anyway. It's like a man abandoning his burning home by saying, "I think I'll take a walk and get some fresh air."

Better to die standing on a picket line than on your knees.

"If we didn't strike, my job would be gone anyway," said Ken Dodge, 57, of Eden Prairie, who, despite 27 years at the airline, figures his job would be among the many Northwest wants to eliminate. "I find it all hard to believe."

Thankfully for the mechanics, they are skilled workers. Many of them have already been looking for new jobs and shoring up their finances:

Mark Herboldt, 39, a lead mechanic at Northwest, is among those who plan to find other work during the strike. In June, he got his general contractor's license. His plan is to spend mornings walking the picket line and afternoons renovating houses.

Herboldt also has in-depth knowledge of the inner workings of hydraulic motors -- a skill he has used in the past to make some extra money repairing large vehicles and construction equipment.

"It's important to remember that there are some talented people out here with a broad range of experiences," said Herboldt, who spoke Saturday while carrying a sign outside the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. "Just because we're on strike doesn't mean we'll be out of work."

They will probably be worse off than as unionized mechanics at Northwest Airlines, and many of them will probably leave the area, a sad loss for Minnesota. But they will survive.

Anyone who believes Northwest isn't out to break the union is kidding themselves. Zack Stephenson at MN Publius notes that NWA spent $100M on training replacement workers (via MPR). $100M would've bought a lot of compromise.

No, it will go something like this.

1. ) Northwest will last out the strike with replacement workers and scabs, already making less than they did as union mechanics.

2.) The union will give up. Most of its members will already have taken another job.

3.) Northwest will announce it is moving nearly all maintenance operations to Malaysia.

4.) Northwest will then lay off most of the replacement workers.

Update: Regarding the mood of the mechanics, check out the NWA forum at US Aviation. I think this post succinctly caputures why the mechanics are striking:

In this situation, however, the mechanics are being asked to vote themselves out of a job because NW wants to outsource a much larger portion of maintenance work. It would be quite difficult for me to vote away my job so that I can go to work fixing VW's while someone in Malaysia does the D checks on 747-400s that I used to do.

21 Comments:

At 9:38 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

They should be worse off Luke.

The fact that the market will only pay them a fraction of what they've extorted in the past is ample evidence of the fact they are overpaid.

The lack of support, not just in terms of picket line crossers, customers continuing to use NWA and even NWA other unions failing to rally to them is ample evidence that this is an unsympathetic crowd.

Finally, the comment about the NWA investment in training is simple math. The $36MM only takes 3 years to overcome the $100MM, nevermind regulatory requirements, and how much of that was a new cost incurred vs a cost shifted from the present mechanics. (In other words, did they spend the $100MM on replacement workers instead of spending it on union mechanics?) It may represent no additional cost (or more likely some fraction thereof.) Regardless, it hardly shows bad faith.

I'm confused, why do you persist on portraying these guys as victims? More importantly, why are you so enamoured of organized labor?

-Cesnored

 
At 9:47 AM, Blogger Luke Francl said...

"Extorted?"

You are beyond belief.

A company setting its price is the "fair market." Workers setting their price is "extortion."

 
At 10:46 AM, Blogger DavidD said...

I think what you both are missing is that both sides, at some point in time, are involved in extorting the other side. Because the skilled tradesmen jobs function in a free-market type environment there will be times when the employee sets the price of services (such as the times when the airlines were booming and travel rates were extremely high thus lots of mechanics were needed) and there will be times when the employer sets the price of service (such as now when the airlines are struggling to keep business and there is an ample supply of workers.) It is simple supply and demand with labor being the commodity.

 
At 1:03 PM, Blogger Bill Tuomala said...

Luke -

I normally don't nitpick over typos, but I see you mistakenly spelled "scabs" as "replacement workers."

 
At 1:23 PM, Blogger Luke Francl said...

Heh, indeed.

 
At 2:18 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm beyond belief?
You're in denial.

Companies don't set prices for anything and that includes labor. Markets set prices.

Their skills are worth exactly what the market will pay for them.

davidd - you are wrong. Collective bargaining is about market manipulation. It is not a free market.

-Censored

 
At 2:50 PM, Blogger Luke Francl said...

You have got to be kidding me.

Collective barganing is not "market manipulation"...it IS the market, and it's protected by the constitution (check Amendment I, right of free association).

Markets don't happen in a vacuum. Markets are created by people and governed by laws. One of the priciples that guides us is that markets should be fair and level. Workers have the right to organize and bargain for what the market will bear for their labor.

A strike is an attempt to restrict labor from the market in order to prove its value and set a fair price. As you've noticed, I'm not optimistic that this particular strike is going to succeed.

However, your callous disregard for the right to organize is absolutely disgusting.

Men and women fought and died for that right. Every worker in America enjoys the fruits of their struggle. Unions have made America a better place to work and live. Under your regime, we'd be stuck in the 1890s with outrageous disparities between the rich and the poor.

Oh wait. As a cheap labor conservative, that's utopia.

Screw that.

 
At 3:36 PM, Blogger Chuck Olsen said...

Setting aside Censored's obvious contempt for the American worker for a moment -

Is outsourcing maintenance to Malaysia the only scenario where NWA financially survives? If so, it seems the global market trumps any possibility for these negotiations to have worked out to anyone's benefit. Whether Minnesota can compete with Malaysia is a question of government policy and regulation, yes? I'm no expert, just asking an honest question.

 
At 4:24 PM, Blogger DavidD said...

I agree with Luke, GASP!!! But collective bargaining is not market manipulation. And I believe in the right of people to organize, however, I am not going to go to the extreme lengths of demonization of the corportaions.

 
At 7:15 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

When Microsoft says you have to take the IE browser with windows and you can't uninstall it, that's an anticompetative practice. The reason is that tying sales of one product to another is unfair to competitors of the "weak" product.

When Microsoft tells Dell that they must ship EVERY PC they make with windows preinstalled or they can not get licenses to preload any of them, its an anticompetative practice because it eliminates consumer choice.

These are market manipulations.

Mechanics saying that "you must use ALL union mechanics paid this exhorbinant rate" and "must hire at least this many regardless of your need" is no different.

These are market manipulations.

Its that simple.

Finally, Luke - are you a veteran? Don't presume to lecture me on what I've fought for. It sure as shit wasn't your union.

There may have been a time when unions helped workers. Its long gone now.

-Censored

 
At 9:43 PM, Blogger Chuck Olsen said...

(apparently Blogger was having comment problems for awhile.)

Censored - the men and women who died for the right to organize weren't in the military. They were American workers.

 
At 10:02 PM, Blogger Chuck Olsen said...

(at least I assume Luke was referring to workers.)

 
At 11:00 PM, Blogger Luke Francl said...

Swiftee, er I mean, "Censored", I figure the only way you sleep at night is that you're so damned ignorant.

Why don't you read up on some Labor Martyrs and come back appropriately chastened?

Every American worker deserves the right to freely choose whether or not to be in a union. Until every American worker actually has that right, the labor movement still has work to do.

 
At 11:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah, you keep after that. Keep telling yourself that its someone else making people leave unions in droves.

Its an idea who's time has past.

-Censored

 
At 11:18 AM, Blogger Luke Francl said...

The decline in union membership might have something to do with union busting.

 
At 10:54 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

best site

 
At 11:03 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

best site

 
At 11:17 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

best site

 
At 11:22 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

best site

 
At 9:22 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

good site

 
At 9:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

good site

 

Post a Comment

<< Home