Napalm redux
The United States is the only country in the world that continues to keep Napalm in its arsenal. Reports are that we are using it in civilian populations.
posted by Chris Dykstra @ 1:06 PM |
| 
11/30/2004 |
THE NEW PATRIOTSPREVIOUS POSTS
MINNESOTA BLOGSTHE LEFT WINGRULES OF ENGAGEMENT
|
6 Comments:
We had to destroy the village in order to save it.
Think about this for a moment: Falluja is (was) a city of 500,000 people. That's larger than Minneapolis. Yet Falluja is always described in the US media as a "town".
If Minneapolis was napalmned by foreign forces, do you think it would be described as a "town"? Do you think the Iraqis think of Falluja as a "town"?
This makes me angry.
You wouldn't like me when I'm angry.
And your information that napalm is being used comes from where?
Also, if you can find a single historical ref. to "we have to destroy a village to save it" being stated by anyone in the US Gov., post your paypal and I will send you a hundred bucks.
Heh, some propagandists you goof-balls are, the word on the street isn't Napalm..that's not quite inflammatory enough to incite the mujahadeen slackers in LA or Seattle.
It's "The Napalm Gas" knuckleheads.
As in we're using chemical weapons on the innocent..get it? Yea, sure and we're bayonetting babies and running the elderly over with our tanks too!
Here, I don't have time to hold your hands while you learn your trade..check in with the mothership.
There you go again, skankee... Don't forget that Iraqi and other Middle-Eastern leaders don't particularly care for Aljazeera, either.
Perhaps you should (re)enlist...
Post a Comment
<< Home