11/17/2004

Mr. President: You pulled the trigger

The slaying of a wounded Iraqi insurgent fighter is playing big in Arab news. It's not good for the United States. I suspect mostly on my side of the street, Democrats and liberals, will decry the act of the killing itself. The killing is nasty business, that's for sure, ugly and brutal as it gets.

Yet I think it's wrong to blame the soldier that pulled the trigger. At the bottom of my pool of conflicting feelings is the idea that I want our soldiers to come back alive. They need to do what they need to do in order to return. In a comment to an earlier post, I said that "We are all the troops, everyone of us." I was roundly criticized by the right wingers that read this blog for comparing myself to a soldier. But I stand by it. Though there is enormous honor and bravery in their actions, I refuse to separate and romanticize the military from us. They are us and we are them. There is far less than six degrees of separation for all of us to anyone in Iraq. We all have family and friends there; Or have friends with family and friends there. None of us wish the death of our soldiers over the death of those we are fighting.

The soldiers in Iraq are out doing the business of our country. In their actions they embody one of the reasons why the USA has endured as the longest standing democratic republic on earth: The military is in the hands of the civilians. That soldier pointing his gun at the wounded man just saw his comrade blown to bits in a similar situation not ten minutes before he pulled the trigger. It is not for me to judge if he was right or wrong from my easy chair. I am sure there were hundreds of equally grevious decisions that were made during the assualt on Falluja. What is hidden from the camera will haunt the soldiers of this nation for decades to come. What appears on camera will haunt the entire nation for decades to come. For that, the civilan leaders of this nation must bear full responsibilty.

It is the President, Ms. Rice, Vice President Cheney, Mr. Rumsfeld and their entire cadre of group thinkers who must be held accountable. For sure they are guilty of the big crimes. It was them who ordered the military to invade Iraq to punish a despot for a crime he didn't commit. They engineered the death of between 30,000 and 100,000 civilians. They are the authors of the book of evil that is Abu Ghraib. It is them who ordered the entire city of Falluja razed to the ground, it's population brutalized, it's women and children cast into a humanitarian crisis the size of which is still unclear. There is more. The truly disasterous mistakes by our national leaders with regards to Iraq can barely be numbered. But first on the list is the mistake of placing our sons and daughters, friends and families, in morally precarious situations in support of a morally wrong war.

5 Comments:

At 7:13 PM, Blogger Chuck Olsen said...

I've had mixed feelings about that shooting, too. This letter from a Marine posted on Power Line puts it in perspective. War is ugly - this war is ugly - that's what it comes down to. We don't blame the soldier, we blame the Commander in Chief and his inner circle.

Unfortunately beating the blame drum rings a little hollow post-election. Slightly more than half of voting Americans decided to not hold Bush accountable for this deceitful, mismanaged mess. So here we are. What always boggled my mind was people who felt "He got us into this mess, he's gotta get us out." a-What? Yes Jimmy, you threw the rock at your sister's head, now you have to stitch it up.

We had the chance to call a qualified doctor. Now we watch carefully and hope to God Jimmy doesn't jam that needle into his sister's head.

 
At 3:22 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

beating the blame drum might be hollow but it still pisses me off that that soldier is gonna get crucified in the press and probably the courts, while the chimpies get off scott free. it's important to shine the light.

 
At 3:50 AM, Blogger Chuck Olsen said...

Oh, don't get me wrong, I think it's important to shine the light. I think Chris' perspective is important.

But I guess I'm just feeling like the people that needed to hear about the deceptions and atrocities of this war (a) didn't hear it, (b) plugged their ears going "Lalalalalala!", and/or (c) heard it, didn't care.

I'm not trying to be defeatist, just realistic. (Okay, maybe a wee defeatist - talk me down here people!) By speaking the truths about the Iraq War, are we preaching to the converted - while the rest blindly believe everything that happens in Iraq is justified and righteous?

 
At 12:11 PM, Blogger Luke Francl said...

Decaf9, it doesn't matter who the person was. If he was alive, it's a war crime to summarily execute prisoners. If he was pretending to be dead in order to reach for a weapon, that's a different story.

We should see what the military investigation says about it. However, the damage has been done. The Islamic militants have another propaganda victory.

Regarding the Lancet study, it has not been discredited. I recommend Tim Lambert's Deltoid blog coverage of this.

 
At 3:08 PM, Blogger Chris Dykstra said...

It would be difficult to condemn the Lancet on its methodology. They are pretty much the gold standard when it comes to epidemiological studies. I agree with you that nobody knows the full extent of civilian deaths in Iraq. But based on the Lancet study, which excludes the data from the Falluja population cluster, by the way, it seems clear that they are much, much higher than the number being published by the coalition.

Chuck- I thought about the "hollowness" of "banging the blame drum." But I don't think that is what I am really doing. I am pointing out that we will likely see our kids on tv doing this kind of thing for some time. We should reserve a large measure of outrage for the guys in office who unleashed the dogs of war.

Decaf - to me, it's an immoral war on several fronts. First, Bush waged war for the wrong reasons. Second, we are killing civilians at a much faster rate than Saddam did. We are waging war on civilians killing them for crime Saddam didn't commit. Does it matter to an Iraqi mother who killed her baby - Saddam's henchmen or a freedom bomb? Her baby is still just as dead. Third, our reckless invasion made the rest of the world less safe. As all of the outcomes of above were known before the war and therefore are the result of a conscious decision, they are immoral. It's my opinion and there it is.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home