7/01/2007

Fairness Doctrine still dead

Wow, the things that Congress can "accomplish" these days. Really, do we need a brazen vote to prevent the FCC from enforcing the long-dormant Fairness Doctrine? Still, despite the obvious premise behind the vote (money talks), I love this quote from Wisconsin's Twin Ports congressman (and Appropriations Committee Chairman) Dave Obey:

We ought to let right-wing talk radio go on as they do now. Rush and Sean are just about as important in the scheme of things as Paris Hilton, and I would hate to see them gain an ounce of credibility by being forced by a government agency or anybody else to moderate their views enough that they might become modestly influential or respected.



Unfortunately Rush and Sean are influential, and even "respected" by moonbats, which is why we need the Fairness Doctrine again.

[n.b. Our own Norm Coleman is co-sponsoring the Senate version of this foredoomed bill.]

2 Comments:

At 3:13 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

If we give government the power to regulate opinon... how can we know they would NEVER abuse such power?

 
At 4:17 PM, Blogger Mark D. said...

I see what you mean t.l.g., but to my eyes the Fairness Doctrine was a way to prevent opinions in mass media from being derived (or approved) by moneyed interests or corporate ideologues. The Doctrine effectively opens a space for "minority" opinions (e.g. libertarianism).

And I don't really consider it a government regulation so much as a countervailing force against the power of corporate monopolies to set agendas and effectively brainwash the public.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home