9/18/2006

What's at stake

This is a very moving Op-ed. It's written by a man who was imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay by mistake. Whether or not you believe that he is telling the truth, it's hard to deny the central proposition: Habeas Corpus is the root of freedom. Kill it and watch freedom die.

I was locked up and mistreated for being in the wrong place at the wrong time during America’s war in Afghanistan. Like hundreds of Guantánamo detainees, I was never a terrorist or a soldier. I was never even on a battlefield. Pakistani bounty hunters sold me and 17 other Uighurs to the United States military like animals for $5,000 a head. The Americans made a terrible mistake.

It was only the country’s centuries-old commitment to allowing habeas corpus challenges that put that mistake right — or began to. In May, on the eve of a court hearing in my case, the military relented, and I was sent to Albania along with four other Uighurs. But 12 of my Uighur brothers remain in Guantánamo today. Will they be stranded there forever?

A related article, U.S. war prisons legal vacuum for 14,000, details some disturbing attributes of the recently exposed network of secret prisons.

Captured on battlefields, pulled from beds at midnight, grabbed off streets as suspected insurgents, tens of thousands now have passed through U.S. detention, the vast majority in Iraq.

Many say they were caught up in U.S. military sweeps, often interrogated around the clock, then released months or years later without apology, compensation or any word on why they were taken. Seventy to 90 percent of the Iraq detentions in 2003 were "mistakes," U.S. officers once told the international Red Cross.

5 Comments:

At 2:18 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Constitution is not a suicide pact. The only one's whose freedom is in jeopardy is the terrorists. You should sue your alma mater for malpractice.

 
At 9:44 PM, Blogger Chris Dykstra said...

I completely agree. The constitution is not a suicide pact. However, you are wrong. According to our military, 80% of the people we detain and arrest are not terrorists. So their freedom is not only in jeapordy, it was removed.

 
At 9:51 PM, Blogger Chris Dykstra said...

Additionally, there were a number of people who were completely innocent and just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time in the sidewalk streets made in NYC during the Republican convention. It is questionable whether anyone was arrested legitimately during the convention. Those sweeps were made possible through the provisions in the patriot act.

Only a fool would discard freedom for saftey. If you allow the state to use its power to "protect" you at its will, it will eventually result in you being protected from everything, especially ideas, protests, literature, "subversion", education, and anything that undermines the state's power.

 
At 12:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yet no blog or newspaper has been shut down. No reporter or commentator has been jailed or threatened for thier speach or ideas. Where are the people just snatched off the street during the conventions? Those that where arrested where far from inoccent persons walking down the side walk. Many in fact actively promoted thier arrest. Basing your argument that they are subsequently not charged is not a valid justification.

Dave

 
At 3:13 AM, Blogger Chris Dykstra said...

There were 1800 people arrested during the GOP convention. 90% of them had the charges dropped. Many of them say they were passersby, which is corroborated by video tape. What do you mean they weren't innocent? http://www.nlgnyc.org/rnc/dunloparticle1.htm

I am sure you do not mean to say that a person's is arrest is evidence that they are guilty of something. Or do you?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home