7/13/2005

Durenberger on a roll

Mike over at Inside Minnesota Politics will have a hot interview with former Republican Senator Dave Durenberger up later this afternoon. Durenberger has some choice words for the Bush administration, Governor Pawlenty and Republicans in general. Here's a taste:

On Iraq:

“We were wrong. It was the wrong decision.I would have never voted for it…. Number one it was the wrong target. There are people we should be at war at, but it’s a whole different war.”


On Mark Kennedy:

“[Kennedy] is basically stuck in a Texas Republican party. It’s not a Minnesota party. He needs to be a Minnesota Republican. And I don’t mean necessarily the current so-called ‘from the business right’ or whatever the right is in Minnesota. Business, church, evangelical or something or other. But he needs to be what his instincts, what his upbringing in PequotLakes, what his education at St. John’s taught him to be – a compassionate conservative.”

On Tim Pawlenty trying to govern from the center:

"I bet on Tim Pawlenty to be that kind of Governor and I still would like to bet on him to be that kind of Governor. Although the evidence so far is… it’s kind of a stretch to find it at the current time.”

On who was damaged most politically by the state government shutdown:

“Here in Minnesota, the blame is going to lie on the Governor”

3 Comments:

At 8:10 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

...and Powerline declares Durenberger a traitor in 3...2...

 
At 9:04 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Traitor? Nah. He's just another RINO.

When he was in office, I doubt any of you would have given him the time of day. But now that the Minnesota left has anointed the Carlson/Durenberger-era IR "moderate" hamsters as "the good Republicans", it's just *amazing* how much ink they get.

It's an attempt to split the GOP. If Pawlenty and the new state chair aren't smart, it could even theoretically work.

 
At 3:02 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Its hard to think that after all the negative press the Dem's in the Senate have engendered for obstruction, that anyone would believe that when the same sort of obstructionism occurs at home, it would be not only the other party, but the executive behind it.

It didn't fly nationally, it won't fly in MN.

-Censored

 

Post a Comment

<< Home